Familia en Madrid vive casa prefabricada construida en seis meses tras crecer su hogar

Resumen ejecutivo

• `insights` (INSIGHTS_AGG):
• `conclusion` (from insights): "La adopción de viviendas prefabricadas se presenta como una solución viable y rápida para familias que necesitan ampliar su espacio habitacional en plazos cortos. "
• `findings` (FINDINGS_EXAMPLES/EVIDENCE): `{"findings": []}` -> Empty list.
• The prompt asks to combine `INSIGHTS_AGG + FINDINGS_EXAMPLES`.
• I need to derive the content for these keys based on the provided input text, adhering strictly to the rules (no invention, use only what's there).
• Draft: El artículo relata la experiencia de Teresa y su familia en Madrid al optar por una vivienda prefabricada para solucionar el espacio insuficiente de su anterior hogar pequeño, completando la estructura en diez días y habitarla en seis meses.

Evidencias

• However, the provided input has a specific structure: "Salida agregados" (Insights) and "Salida evidencias" (Findings).
• However, looking at the input provided in the prompt context ("Salida agregados", "Salida evidencias"), it seems I am processing these specific outputs. The `insights` contain the narrative facts. The `findings` are empty.

Conclusión final

3. Map Input to Output Structure:

Acciones

• The task says: "Combina INSIGHTS_AGG + FINDINGS_EXAMPLES en un JSON estricto. " with keys `summary`, `evidence`, `conclusion`, `actions`.
• Summary**: Should reflect the main points from `insights`. The insights describe Teresa's experience.
• Evidence**: Should come from `findings` or specific parts of `insights` that act as evidence. The input says `"findings": []`. This means there is no explicit "evidence" section provided in the input data to cite directly (like quotes or specific data points labeled as findings). However, the instructions say "Combina INSIGHTS_AGG + FINDINGS_EXAMPLES". Since `FINDINGS_EXAMPLES` is empty, I cannot invent evidence. The rule says: "Si no hay evidencia suficiente para summary/evidence/actions, devuelve lista vacía. "
• Wait, the input provides `insights` which contain factual claims (10 days construction, 6 months habitation). Can these serve as evidence for the summary? Usually, in this task structure, `summary` is a synthesis of insights, and `evidence` should be specific quotes or data points supporting it. Since `findings` is empty, I must return an empty list for `evidence` to comply with "No inventes: usa SOLO lo que aparece en los textos" and "Si no hay evidencia suficiente. devuelve lista vacía".
• Constraint: "Si no hay evidencia suficiente para summary/evidence/actions, devuelve lista vacía. " -> This applies to evidence specifically if there's nothing to cite. Since `findings` is explicitly empty, I should probably leave `evidence` as an empty list or use the insights as supporting text?
• Re-reading the instruction: "Combina INSIGHTS_AGG + FINDINGS_EXAMPLES en un JSON estricto. " and "Cada elemento debe estar sustentado en los textos. "