Qué precios vaticinan los futuros del petróleo

Resumen ejecutivo

• `insights` contains two points about analysts using Brent futures and market alertness due to uncertainty.
• `findings` is empty.
• I need to map the provided `insights` and `findings` into this structure.
• Constraint Check: "Combina INSIGHTS_AGG + FINDINGS_EXAMPLES en un JSON estricto. " (Combine Insights Agg + Findings Examples into a strict JSON).
• The output format specified in the prompt example is:
• However, I must follow the rule: "No inventes: usa SOLO lo que aparece en los textos. " (Do not invent: use ONLY what appears in the texts).
• I need to map these inputs into the required output structure.
• Input `insights` can populate `summary`.
• Since `findings` is empty, I cannot provide concrete textual evidence (`evidence`). However, the `insights` themselves are statements. Can they serve as summary? Yes. Can they serve as conclusion? The input already has a `conclusion` in "Salida agregados".
• Rule: "No inventes: usa SOLO lo que aparece en los textos. " (Do not invent). I must use the provided text.
• Input `insights` -> Can be used for `summary`.
• Input `conclusion` from "Salida agregados" -> Can be used for `conclusion` key in output JSON.
• `summary`: Combine the two insight points into a list of strings (or keep them as is). The prompt example shows a summary list. I will use the insights provided.

Evidencias

• The input provided by the user is labeled "Salida agregados" (Insights Agg) and "Salida evidencias" (Findings Examples).
• Rule: "Si no hay evidencia suficiente para conclusion, devuelve string vacío. " (If not enough evidence for conclusion, return empty string). But the input *provides* a conclusion in "Salida agregados": "La volatilidad en los futuros del petróleo refleja una alta incertidumbre en el mercado respecto a la evolución futura de los precios. "
• Item 1: "Los analistas utilizan los futuros del barril de Brent a corto, mediano y largo

Conclusión final

3. Drafting the Content:

Acciones

• The prompt asks for a JSON structure with keys: `summary`, `evidence`, `conclusion`, `actions`.
• The input provides `insights` and `findings`. It does NOT provide explicit text for `summary`, `evidence`, `actions` directly, but I need to derive them from the provided inputs (`INSIGHTS_AGG` + `FINDINGS_EXAMPLES`).
• Wait, looking closely at the instruction: "Combina INSIGHTS_AGG + FINDINGS_EXAMPLES en un JSON estricto. " and then shows a template with keys `summary`, `evidence`, `conclusion`, `actions`.
• Input `findings` is empty, so `evidence` should likely be empty or derived from insights if possible, but rule says "Si no hay evidencia suficiente para summary/evidence/actions, devuelve lista vacía. " (If not enough evidence for summary/evidence/actions, return empty list).
• Input `findings` is empty -> `evidence` should be empty list because there are no specific findings to cite as evidence (quotes, headlines, etc. ). The insights are summaries/analyst views, not necessarily raw evidence text like "Headline says. ".
• Input does not provide `actions`. So `actions` must be empty.